Why Family Business Strategic Plans Stall After the Founder Steps Back

What changes when one family business owner’s decisions become a leadership team’s job, and how to build a plan that holds up in execution.

By Bill Stranberg, Stranberg, and Jude Rake, JDR Growth Partners

Executive Summary

When a family business moves from one leader to several, strategic planning tests whether the leadership team can make decisions together. Bill Stranberg and Jude Rake recommend investing in the team first: surfacing honest disagreement, involving the difference makers who know how work gets done, grounding the plan in authentic values and an objective view of the market, and planning for execution before launch.

---

When a family business moves from one decision-maker to many, the strategic plan rarely breaks first. In a founder-led company, strategy often lives in one person’s instincts. When that leader steps back, the same decisions may fall to three siblings who can’t agree on the future, or to a non-family CEO trying to align an ownership group. In these scenarios, an effective leadership team is the missing piece. Without that, momentum stalls and the business loses ground to its competitors.

Bill Stranberg of Stranberg and Jude Rake of JDR Growth Partners see this pattern from two directions: Bill through executive search, Jude through strategic planning with family-owned companies. Their shared conclusion: a family business heading into a leadership transition needs a strategic plan, but first it needs an executive team that can argue productively, build that plan together, and carry it through execution.

Families often call Jude believing they need a new vision statement or strategic plan. And while that may be true, they also need an executive leadership team that’s functioning on high cylinders and acting as a high-performance team.

Why do family business leadership teams struggle after the founder steps back?

Many family business executive teams rely on the founder or owner to hold everything together. Jude describes these teams as a collection of individuals whose first loyalty is to the function they run. The head of finance is loyal to finance. The head of sales is loyal to sales. Whoever steps into the top role inherits that problem, which is why Jude’s Smart Growth strategic planning process prioritizes the executive leadership team before the plan.

PwC’s 2021 Global Family Business Survey found that only 30% of family businesses had a documented, communicated succession plan in place. Without one, leadership changes hands, and the burden of setting direction falls on a team that may never have made decisions together before.

How can family businesses put hard topics on the table productively?

Jude doesn’t hedge on how rare constructive contention is: “I’ve yet to serve on, lead, or advise a team that had enough constructive contention.”

This goes beyond ordinary debate to voicing unpleasant truths people have learned to keep to themselves. Jude gathers those truths in one-on-one conversations, then brings them into strategic work sessions without threatening anyone. An outside facilitator with no stake in the outcome can help the group see that the goal is to move the business forward, not to assign blame.

How can a family business turn conflict into progress?

For heated disagreements, Jude uses polarity mapping, a tool he learned from John L. Ward in Kellogg’s governing family enterprise program. The team takes two ideas that seem opposed and talks through the benefits and unintended consequences of each without deciding anything yet. “Typically we’re all trying to achieve the same thing, and we’re all trying to avoid the same thing,” Jude explains. “We just have different ideas on how to get there.” Handled well, the conversation moves people toward the middle and helps them recognize “a paradox and not a problem to be solved.”

Who should be involved in family business strategic planning?

It depends on the family. “Once you meet one family-owned company, you’ve met one family-owned company,” Jude says. The owner may be the CEO, a board member, or an executive chair, and the right planning group shifts with that structure.

Jude also interviews the company’s difference makers: people who rank high on both performance and leadership potential. To find them, he asks leaders a simple question: if someone left the company today, who would give you the greatest heartburn? That list often differs from HR’s list of high-potentials, and those people, closer to the front lines, supply much of the material for constructive contention.

How should family businesses use core values in strategic planning?

“If all you do is define [values], you really miss the big opportunity, which is leveraging them.”

Jude Rake, JDR Growth Partners

In Jude’s process, teams also define behavioral norms, name the sacred cows, and identify what is getting in the way of success. That work feeds a later “from-to” statement describing how the culture needs to change.

Integrity and doing the right thing are table stakes. Jude looks for what makes a company different. At S.C. Johnson, a statement called “This We Believe” reflected the belief that new products should be special and different, not at parity. At Fellowes, where Jude served as president, resourcefulness was a core value. His test for a real value echoes Jim Collins: you would be willing to change industries or markets to preserve it.

Bill offered Wegmans supermarkets as an example. As he described it, the family believed every employee deserves to have dinner with their family every night, a belief that shapes decisions as practical as how far people commute. As a recruiter, Bill has been asked to recruit Wegmans’ talent and hasn’t been able to. “No one leaves Wegmans,” he says.

How does a family business objectively assess its position in the market?

Jude’s process then turns outward through four lenses: market, operations, talent and culture, and financial. Market comes first. Teams use tools such as a strategy canvas, Porter’s Five Forces, and the Ansoff matrix, going well beyond a standard SWOT analysis. The core question is whether the company is focused on its point of difference or “spreading resources like peanut butter trying to be everything to everybody.”

Executives lead each lens with cross-functional teams of difference makers who do the analysis themselves, so they own the plan when it is built. Bill described the advisor’s role as functioning “more like a mirror” than a soapbox.

Why does strategic plan buy-in fade before execution?

To keep the lenses from becoming silos, every team reports back in monthly sessions with the leadership team, which then defines a ten-year vision and builds a three-year plan cross-functionally.

Even so, Bill sees a familiar pattern: owners agree in month one, then a squeaky wheel shows up months later. Bill calls it alignment on the whiteboard. Jude’s answer is to invite friction early. “I actually want the squeaky wheel early on in the process,” he says. Between monthly sessions, he meets one-on-one with each team member to make sure people are either comfortable or honest about their discomfort, which is sometimes valid and needs to be addressed.

Why do family business strategic plans fail in execution?

“Anybody can put together a plan, but it’s executing that’s the hard part,” Jude says. In a 2005 Harvard Business Review article, “Turning Great Strategy into Great Performance,” Michael Mankins and Richard Steele reported that, on average, companies’ strategies deliver only 63% of their promised financial value. Jude’s execution phase builds on their findings.

• Structure and capabilities. For each strategy, the team names the capabilities required and assigns an owner to close the gap.

• Priorities and resources. Each top initiative gets a leadership team sponsor and a named cross-functional team, so the same difference makers aren’t stretched across every project.

• Communication. People learn how their work connects to the plan because they want to know their job is meaningful.

• Cascading accountability. A balanced scorecard carries goals through the organization, and the leadership team holds itself accountable too.

How do family businesses manage culture change when the plan raises the bar?

Bill named the hard part plainly: an A player under the old plan can become a C player under the new one, and in a family business that person may have been close to the company, and the family, for decades. Jude returns to the from-to statement. When leaders stand up at a town hall and honestly describe how the company operates today in ways that hold it back, people pay attention.

With honest feedback, some people improve. Those who don’t within about six months should be let go compassionately and treated fairly. Jude sees that as a service to the difference makers, because “most of them are tired of being treated the same way mediocre and poor performers are treated.”

Frequently Asked Questions

What is constructive contention in a leadership team?

Constructive contention is healthy debate that brings difficult topics and unpleasant truths into the open so a team can plan around them. The aim is to resolve obstacles during planning rather than discover them in execution.

What is polarity mapping, and how does it help family businesses?

Polarity mapping is a facilitation tool that helps a team examine two seemingly opposed positions by discussing each position's benefits and unintended consequences before deciding. It often reveals that the issue is a paradox to manage, not a problem with one right answer.

Who are the difference makers in a family business?

Difference makers are employees who rank high on both performance and leadership potential, and whom the organization would struggle to lose. They often differ from a formal high-potential list.

How far ahead should a family business strategic plan look?

In Jude Rake’s process, the envisioned future looks ten years ahead, and the action plan covers three years.

Why do strategic plans fail during a leadership transition?

Strategic plans most often fail during a leadership transition because the leadership team never truly aligned, and concerns that were not voiced early surface during execution.

About the Authors

Bill Stranberg is the Managing Partner of Stranberg, an executive search and succession advisory firm focused exclusively on family enterprises. Stranberg works with family businesses navigating leadership transition, CEO succession planning, and outside executive search.

Jude Rake is the founding principal of JDR Growth Partners, a consulting firm that helps family-owned businesses, boards, chief executives, and their leadership teams achieve improved results and sustainable growth. Before founding JDR, Jude served in multiple C-level roles – including CEO – for fifteen years.

Jude is also the author of The Bridge to Growth: How Servant Leaders Achieve Better Results and Why It Matters Now More Than Ever. Find out more at jdrgrowthpartners.com and The Bridge to Growth. His next book will be released in 2027 and is titled SMART Start™: The First-Time CEOs Playbook for Building a High-Performance Organization.